|
 |
Structure-
When disregarding content, writing working papers (WPs) and resolutions is as easy as starting
a civil war in the Republic of the Congo. WPs and resolutions are incredibly similar; in high school terms, a WP
is the "rough draft" of a resolution. Because both are so alike, only the steps
to structuring a WP are listed below--for the purposes of IR at WA, simply switch "Working Paper #.#" (Step One) to "Resolution
#.#" when constructing a resolution.
|
 |
1) Title: Working Paper #.#
Delegates consistently confuse the United Nations numbering system. It's pretty basic, guys. The first #
starts at one and escalates as new working papers enter the floor. For example, the first WP on the floor would be called
Working Paper 1.1; the second would be called Working Paper 2.1, and
so forth. The second # refers to the amount of times a WP has been edited. For example, Working Paper
1.1 is introduced, but the sponsors later decide to add, change or remove clauses. In true parliamentary procedure,
they would then introduce the edited document as Working Paper 1.2.
2) Sponsors
To be considered a sponsor, a member state must directly contribute to the drafting of a WP.
By becoming a sponsor, a member state officially declares that it agrees with the ENTIRE working paper-- all statements, actions,
claims and commitments as well as incredibly mundane concepts, like word choice and tone.

3) Signatories
For some unknown cosmic reason, most IR 1 students (and some IR 2s) are under the impression that member
states must support a WP before they become signatories. This is an incredibly common Model UN misconception. Signatoryship
(I may have just pulled a Shakespeare) simply means that a member state would like to see the Working Paper
introduced to the floor. Signatories don't necessarily need to endorse any piece of a particular WP. However, signatories
must embrace all concepts of a Working Paper once it reaches resolution status (PS: This last sentence is currently being
debated. It will be updated shortly).
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
4) Preambulatory Clauses (PCs)
The word "preambulatory" stems from the word "preamble." "Preamble" is basically just a really
fancy word for introduction. Simply put, preambulatory clauses are shorter versions of the first and third part of a
position paper (see Writing a Position Paper). They establish background and provide justification for the actions that sponsors later suggest. PCs always begin with verbs, which should be italicized. More
often than not, these verbs end in "-ing."

5) Appropriate UN Bodies
Between the PCs and Operative Clauses lies the name of the appropriate UN body, which
is followed by a semi-colon. For example, if the simulation were on the Security Council it would say "The United
Nations Security Council;" If it were on UNICEF, it would instead say "The United Nations Children's Emergency Fund;" Got it?

6) Operative Clauses
Operative clauses are simply the requests, recommendations, demands, and actions of the committee. Operative
clauses are numbered and begin with a verb in the singular present form. Verbs are underlined.
When an operative clause has multiple parts, break it up into bullets using standard number/letter note-taking format. An
example is pictured below.

|
 |
|
|
|
7) Putting It All Together
Click here to view the full draft of an actual working paper.
Because, Chad, we want to invade Djibouti with the aid of Greece, too.
|
|
|
 |